检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁玮[1] 王浩彦[1] 徐秋芬[1] 徐玮涵[1] 富耀瑄[1] 杨小丽[1] 赵旭娟[1] 李宾[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院呼吸内科,北京100050
出 处:《中国呼吸与危重监护杂志》2013年第4期329-333,共5页Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
基 金:首都卫生发展科研专项项目(编号:首发2011-2002-03)
摘 要:目的通过分析慢肺活量(VC)与用力肺活量(FVC)的差异,探讨两种肺活量指标在评估稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者气流受限程度中的作用。方法纳入200例稳定期COPD患者和114例健康受试者,行肺功能测定VC、FVC、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、第1秒用力呼气容积占预计值百分比(FEV1%pred)。结果 COPD组VC与FVC的差值(VC-FVC)显著大于对照组[(145.40±157.50)mL比(21.10±61.30)mL,P<0.001],COPD组FVC与VC的比值(FVC/VC)显著低于对照组[(93.61±7.10)%比(99.27±2.24)%,P<0.001]。COPD组VC-FVC与FEV1%pred呈负相关(r=-0.412,P<0.001),FVC/VC与FEV1%pred呈正相关(r=0.517,P<0.001)。FEV1%pred≥50%的COPD患者VC-FVC明显小于FEV1%pred<50%的患者[(78.23±108.26)mL比(189.26±169.21)mL,P=0.003]。结论 VC-FVC和FVC/VC是简便易得的静息肺功能指标,可用作稳定期COPD患者气道阻塞严重程度的辅助诊断。Objective To evaluate if the difference between slow vital capacity (VC) and forced vital capacity (FVC) could be used to predict severity of airflow limitation in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods VC and FVC were measured in 200 patients with COPD [ 159 males;mean FEV1, (49. 31 ± 15.75 )% of predicted ] and 114 healthy controls [ 64 males; mean FEVI ,(99. 67 + 13.62)% of predicted]. Results The difference between VC and FVC (VC - FVC), which showed a negative correlation with FEVl of predicted ( r = - 0. 412, P 〈 0. 001 ), was significantly larger in the COPD patients than that in the controls [ ( 145.40 _+ 157. 50) mL vs. (21.10 + 61.30) mL,P 〈 0. 001 ]. The FVC/VC ratio was significantly lower in the COPD patients than that in the controls [ (93.61 + 7. 10)% vs. (99. 27 -+2. 24)% ,P 〈0. 001 ] ,and was positively correlated with FEV~ of predicted in the COPD patients (r =0. 517 ,P 〈0. 001 ). There was significant difference in VC- FVC in the COPD patients with FEV1 ~50% of predicted (5 patients in GOLD level 1 and 74 patients in GOLD level 2 ) and those patients with FEV1 〈 50% of predicted (106 patients in GOLD level 3 and 15 patients in GOLD level 4) [ (78.23 -+ 108. 26 ) mL vs. ( 189.26 -+ 169. 21 ) mL, P = 0. 003 ]. Conclusion The difference between VC and FVC and the FVC/VC ratio, which are more easily obtained from spirometric test, are able to detect severity of airflow limitation in patients with stable COPD.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80