检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁玎[1] 吴群红[1] 郝艳华[1] 焦明丽[1] 崔宇[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学卫生管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150086
出 处:《中国医院管理》2013年第7期13-15,共3页Chinese Hospital Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71073044);教育部博士点基金(2010230711018);黑龙江省卫生厅课题(2009-227)
摘 要:目的通过对现行医院准入规制各项措施的重要性、失效程度等四方面进行综合评价,筛选优先干预措施,为建立有效的医院规制体系提供依据。方法运用文献研究、现场调查及TOPSIS法对我国医院准入各项措施进行综合比较和评价,筛选优先干预措施。结果我国医院准入规制改革的优先策略应以强化对公立医院规模、数量、布局管控为重要突破口,辅以对医院人员编制的准入以及对医保定点机构的强化管理手段为支撑。结论TOPSIS法适宜应用于医院规制优先干预关键点的筛选,我国现行医院准入规制措施亟待改革调整。Objectives Through comprehensive evaluation on the effect of existing hospital admittance regulations from 4 aspects which are importance and the degree of failure, etc, so as to select priority interventions and provide a basis for the establishment of an effective system of hospitat regulation. Methods Literature research, field investigation and TOPSIS method were applied to evaluate comprehensively and compare the various hospital admission regulation mea- sures. Results The priority strategy and a breakthrough to the current hospital admittance regulations is to reform and fur- ther strengthen the management and control the size, number and layout of the public hospital. Meanwhile, it should be supported by much enhanced regulation on hospital staffing and management on designated hospitals of health insurance agencies. Conclusions TOPSIS method is a suitable tool for conducting comprehensive evaluation and identifying priority intervention strategy. Current hospital regulatory measures need to be reformed and regulated.
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13