检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高文杰[1] 王亚坤[1] 安淑华[1] 田利远[1] 李金英[1] 孙军锋[1] 李清涛[1] 杨帆[1]
机构地区:[1]河北省儿童医院呼吸心内1科,石家庄市050031
出 处:《中华全科医学》2013年第9期1336-1337,1369,共3页Chinese Journal of General Practice
基 金:河北省医学适用技术跟踪项目(GL2010-07)
摘 要:目的探讨中心静脉导管在小儿肺炎旁胸腔积液(PPE)治疗中的价值及安全性。方法将68例经超声确诊为中或大量PPE的患儿,随机分成两组:治疗组(n=34例)行中心静脉导管持续胸腔闭式引流,对照组(n=34例)行传统胸腔穿刺引流,比较两组胸腔积液的引流量、退热时间、气促改善时间、胸水吸收时间、住院时间等。结果治疗组的引流量、气促改善时间、胸水吸收时间、住院时间、病原诊断率优于对照组,组间比较差异有统计学意义。治疗组的退热时间、并发症、不良反应与对照组比较差异无统计学意义。结论中心静脉导管持续胸腔闭式引流是一种操作简单、效果好、损伤小且安全的治疗方法,尤其值得在儿科推广。Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of pediatric parapneumonic pleural effusion by closed pleural drainage using a central venous catheter, compared with using a conventional thoracentesis. Methods 68 cases with Medium or large parapneumonic pleural effusion diagnosed by chest ultrasound were randomly divided into two groups: the patients in treatment group( n = 34) were undergone by persistently closed pleural drainage using a central venous catheter. The patients in control group( n=34 ) were drainaged by conventional thoracentesis, the drainage fever clearance time, shortness of breath improve pleural fluid absorption time, hospitalization time of two groups were compared. Results The drainage, shortness of breath improve time and the time of pleural effusion absorption of the treatment group were better than those of the control group, there were significant differences between the two groups, but there was no significant difference in fever clearance time. Conclusion Central venous catheter closed thoracic drainage was an effective and injury treatment worthy of promotion in pedi- atrics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3