检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟明奇[1]
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学中国古代文学与文献研究中心,杭州310036
出 处:《浙江工商大学学报》2013年第4期11-17,共7页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
摘 要:新时期以来,人们对明末清初著名文学家李渔的评价已发生很大的变化。本文反思鲁迅先生之视李渔为"帮闲"此李渔研究中一个比较重要的学术命题,试图对李渔其人作出相对公允的评价。本文认为,李渔与那些以帮闲为职业的人并不相同,他的思想、个性等等其实有着诸多很不"帮闲"的地方;"帮闲"主要是李渔人生后期的社会形象。李渔之沦落为帮闲,主要归因于他竭力崇尚享乐、奉行趋时善变的市井实用主义人生哲学及由此形成的人格上的"无特操"。Ever since the new age, people's evaluation of Li Yu has greatly changed. This article gives introspection to Lu Xun's study of Li Yu as a penster, which is an important academic proposition, and tries to have a relatively fair evaluation of Li Yu. It is believed in this article that Li Yu, as a penster, was different from those professional pensters for his thoughts and personality . Being a penster was mainly the social image in the later stage of his life. The reason why Li Yu became a penster lay in his philosophy advocating hedonism, pursuing capricious pragmatism as well as in his personality with no independent integrity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222