检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘松[1] 何健[1] 管文贤[2] 李强[2] 周竹萍[1] 俞海平[1] 包善华[2] 周正扬[1]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学鼓楼临床医学院医学影像科,江苏南京210008 [2]南京医科大学鼓楼临床医学院普外科,江苏南京210008
出 处:《实用放射学杂志》2013年第7期1091-1093,1097,共4页Journal of Practical Radiology
基 金:基金项目:江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK2012531);南京市医学科技发展基金(2012001);南京市卫生青年人才培养工程(第三层次).
摘 要:目的探讨3.0TMR弥散加权成像(DWI)在贲门癌诊断及T分期中的应用价值。方法2名观察者分别独立分析31例贲门癌患者术前MRT2WI、DWI和增强图像,对肿瘤进行检测和分期,并与手术病理进行对照。结果DWI检测到了所有贲门癌病灶,1例病灶在T:wI和增强图像未能发现。总体T分期准确率比较中,DWI(80.6%)显著高于T。WI(58.1%)(P=0.039),DWI与增强图像无显著性差异(P=0.727)。DWI观察者间一致性(Kappa=0.811)优于增强(Kappa=0.640)和T2WI(Kappa=0.555)。结论DWI在贲门癌T分期中的准确率显著高于T2wI,在某些情况下有望替代MR增强扫描。Objective To evaluate the application of diffusion-weighted imaging{DWI) on 3.0T MR in preoperative diagnosis and T staging of cardia cancer. Methods Two radiologists interpreted preoperative T2 WI,DWI and contrast-enhancement (CE} MR ima- ging of 31 patients with cardia cancers independently. The lesions were detected and staged, with the reference of post-operative his- topathological findings. Results All the eardia cancers were detected in DWI, while one lesion was missed in both T2WI and CE MRI. Overall T staging accuracy in DWI was significantly higher than that in TeWI {80.6% vs 58.1 % ,P=0. 039), while there was no significant difference between DWI and CE MRI (P 0.727). DWI (Kappa=0.811} had a better interobserver agreement than CE MRI(Kappa--0.640} and T2WI (Kappa=0. 555). Conclusion DWIis superior toT2WlinT staging accuracy of cardia canc- ers, and has the potential to replace CE MRI in some cases.
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R735.2[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147