评价忽视与评价重视对运动员自我控制损耗的影响  

The Effect of Reappraisal Negligence and Reappraisal Reinforcement on Athletes' Self-control Depletion

作　　者：张连成[1] 张力为[2] 高淑青[2] 刘嘉蕙[2] 

机构地区：[1]天津体育学院健康与运动科学系,天津300381 [2]北京体育大学运动人体科学学院

出　　处：《中国运动医学杂志》2013年第6期529-534,共6页Chinese Journal of Sports Medicine

基　　金：国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2012BAKB21B03);天津体育学院青年科研基金项目(2012);天津体育学院博士科研启动项目

摘　　要：通过两个实验检验了评价忽视与评价重视两种情绪调节策略对运动员自控损耗的影响。36名足球专项大学生参与了实验1,17名网球、3名羽毛球以及13名乒乓球专项大学生参与了实验2,他们被随机分配到评价忽视、评价重视以及控制组中。所有参与者先完成8分30秒的情绪控制任务,然后实验1的参与者完Stroop任务,实验2的参与者完成Visual-CCPT任务。结果发现,评价重视组在Stroop不一致任务中的错误数显著高于评价忽视组,评价重视组在Visual-CCPT任务中的虚报数显著高于简单观看组及评价忽视组。这提示,运动员采取一定的认知调整策略对消极情绪进行评价忽视,具有重要的实践意义。Two experiments were conducted to test the effect of reappraisal negligence and reappraisal reinforcement on athletes＇ self-control depletion. Thirty-six football collegiate students participated in experiment 1;and 17 tennis,3 badminton,and 13 table tennis collegiate students participated in experiment 2. They were randomly allocated to （a）reappraisal-negligenee group, （b） reappraisal-reinforcement group, and （c）control group. After an emotion control task （8 minutes and 30 seconds）, the participants in experiment 1 completed the Stroop task, and the participants in experiment 2 completed the Visual-CCPT task. MANOVA results showed that the reappraisal-reinforcement group had more error numbers of unmatched Stroop task than the reappraisal-negligence group, more commission numbers of Visual-CCPT task than the simply-watching group and reappraisal-negligence group. These results suggested that athletes should ignore negative emotions to save energy and give guarantee for subsequent self-control task.

关 键 词：自我控制 自控损耗 评价忽视 评价重视 运动员 

分 类 号：G812.3[文化科学—体育学]