《侵权责任法》第三人原因免责规定之虚构  

The Fiction of Third Reason for Exemption in "The Tort Liability Law"

作　　者：龚佳崴[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《学理论》2013年第16期125-128,共4页Theory Research

摘　　要：无论从法条规则出发抑或理论上分析,《侵权责任法》中皆无规定第三人原因免责的必要。第三人免责一般条款也无法作为具体条款的原则性规定。侵权法中第86条第2款也不能理解为第三人免责条款。理论上第三人原因免责概念并不成立;效果上第三人原因也不可能发生减轻责任的后果。analysis no matter from the rule of law or theory,＂The tort liability law＂ has no necessity of third reasons for exemption.The provisions of the third exemption general terms also cannot be used as a specific clause.Tort law article eighty-sixth paragraph second cannot be understood as third exemption clause.Third people on the concept of theory of exemption is not established,The reason the third person effect is not possible to reduce the consequences of responsibility.

关 键 词：第三人原因 免责 侵权 

分 类 号：D920.4[政治法律—法学]