检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙毅[1]
机构地区:[1]西安外国语大学<外语教学>编辑部,陕西西安710061
出 处:《解放军外国语学院学报》2013年第4期10-16,127,共7页Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
基 金:教育部人文社会科学基金项目"基于ERP实验的隐喻认知神经机理研究"(11YJC740094);陕西省社会科学基金项目"认知隐喻学多维跨域研究"(12K143)
摘 要:概念隐喻观作为隐喻理论中极其重要的支柱性学脉,成为认知语言学研究的一股核心源流。但学者在宣称"语言的隐喻性本质"的同时却没有去证明"概念隐喻衍生自语言性隐喻"这一根本性命题。认知语言学者由隐喻表达式所衍推出的概念映射始终停留在理论假设的层面,惯于依循固定范式捏造隐喻数据。语料库语言学在大量的现实语言样本基础上提炼分布范式,所获弘博的数据令识解结果更为可靠和信服。本文以自建语料库为平台论证:完全也应该可以在诉诸Wmatrix语料库工具的前提下与"学术知觉"的定性分析有机地结合起来,以保证在真实语篇中完整地呈现隐喻全景。Conceptual metaphor theory has been deemed as one indispensable pillar research vein within metaphor surveys,and acknowledged as a significant probing stream along cognitive linguistics.Regrettably,researchers,while proclaiming that language is metaphorical in nature,fundamentally ignore testifying the proposition that conceptual metaphors derive from linguistic metaphors,leading to mere academic blindness and dilemma.Those cognitive linguists who elicit conceptual mappings from metaphorical expressions constantly linger on the hierarchy of theoretical hypothesis.Scholars might as well,on the basis of collecting as many naturally-occurring exemplars as possible and gaining extensive statistical data,render the identification of metaphors more reliable and convincing.This article,based on the self-built corpora,attempts to postulate that it is absolutely necessary and plausible to resort to coherently integrate Wmatrix Corpus Linguistic Program and scholarly intuition to depict a complete and intact metaphorical scenario in genuine texts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112