论国际商事仲裁中仲裁庭的临时保全措施决定权  

Analysis of Arbitral Tribunal’s Authority to Grant Interim Measures in International Commercial Arbitration

作　　者：胡荻[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学国际法学院,上海200051

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2013年第4期102-110,共9页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"仲裁‘一裁终局’制度之困境及本位回归研究"(11BFX143)

摘　　要：临时保全措施现已成为国际商事仲裁中一个重要的程序问题,但仲裁庭作为仲裁程序实施的主体,各国对其是否有权决定临时保全措施,并且在何种程度上有权决定都仍尚存异议。在支持仲裁的理念和确保仲裁程序顺利开展的要求下,仲裁庭对临时保全措施的决定权应在合理限制的基础上加以确认并有所扩展。我国法律尚未赋予仲裁庭临时保全措施的决定权,这既有碍于仲裁实践,也有悖于国际潮流,因此应当予以改变和完善。Interim measures of protection has becomes a critical procedure in international commercial arbitration.Even though arbitral tribunal plays an essential role in the arbitral proceeding,states still hold different opinions on whether arbitral tribunal possesses the authority to order interim measures and to what extent arbitral tribunal may exercise its power.Since the principle of pro-arbitration has been widely accepted and arbitral tribunal should have the power to control the proceeding,arbitration statutes should move towards a willingness to permit arbitral tribunal to grant interim measures under certain condition.However,the Chinese legislation tends to prohibit arbitrators’ power to order any provisional measures,which is not conducive to the practice.Hence,it is necessary to improve the legislation in China.

关 键 词：国际商事仲裁 临时保全措施 仲裁庭权力 单方面临时措施 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]