MIP-CGP同ARFCC工艺对比分析  

Comparative Analysis of MIP-CGP Process and ARFCC Process

作　　者：郭大鹏[1] 崔颖[1] 吴迪[1] 杨明[1] 覃运明 

机构地区：[1]中国石油抚顺石化公司,辽宁抚顺113008

出　　处：《当代化工》2013年第7期939-943,960,共6页Contemporary Chemical Industry

摘　　要：探讨了两种不同型式催化汽油降烯烃工艺的运行情况与技术指标,在某重油催化装置运行数据表明,MIP-CGP工艺比ARFCC工艺具有较大的技术优势,MIP-CGP改造后同ARFCC相比,能耗下降13.16个单位,总液收提高6.38%,汽油辛烷值提升1.5个单位,但柴油和油浆密度变重。Operating situation and technical indexes of two different types of catalytic cracking gasoline olefin reduction processes were discussed.The results indicate that MIP-CGP process is better than ARFCC process;after using MIP-CGP process,energy consumption drops 13.16 units,total fluid yield increases by 6.38%,gasoline octane number increases by 1.5 units,but the density of diesel oil and pulp is bigger.

关 键 词：催化裂化 烯烃 ARFCC MIP-CGP 辛烷值 

分 类 号：TE624[石油与天然气工程—油气加工工程]