中国省际工业绿色发展评估  

Evaluation on Green Development of China’s Provincial Industry

作　　者：苏利阳[1,2] 郑红霞[1,2] 王毅[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所,北京100190 [2]中国科学院研究生院,北京100190

出　　处：《中国人口·资源与环境》2013年第8期116-122,共7页China Population,Resources and Environment

基　　金：工业和信息化部委托项目"中国工业绿色发展指数研究"的阶段性成果

摘　　要：有关绿色发展评价和指标研究已成为绿色经济研究中的前沿领域和重点。该文旨在将绿色发展的评估研究延伸至工业领域,进而为监测、评估和诊断中国工业绿色发展提供支撑。该文首次从绿色生产、绿色产品、绿色产业三个方面界定了工业绿色发展内涵,认为工业绿色发展可以理解为在促进工业经济持续较快增长和提供更多、更好工业产品和服务以满足人们日益增长需求的同时,通过绿化工艺系统和生产过程、生产绿色低碳产品、发展绿色新兴产业,最终协调工业发展与资源环境容量有限之间的矛盾。鉴此,本文认为可以从绿色生产、绿色产品、绿色产业三个方面衡量工业绿色发展的进展,这为开展工业绿色发展评估提供理论基础。在实践应用中,由于数据可得性等原因,本文围绕绿色生产构建了基于综合指数法的"工业绿色发展绩效指数"。评估结果显示,2005-2010年我国工业绿色发展绩效水平年均改善幅度为9.5%,反映工业生产正实现与资源环境消耗的脱钩,但改善速度逐年下降,表明未来亟需挖掘新的节能减排潜力;分地区看,天津、北京、广东等东部发达省市是中国工业绿色发展绩效水平较好的地区,但各个地区的优势均有所不同,其中天津在工业水资源利用居于领先,北京在工业土地资源方面较为落后,广东在工业能源利用的表现突出;宁夏的工业绿色发展绩效水平远远落后于其他地区,原因是工业能源利用和污染物排放控制方面较为落后;同时,"十一五"期间各地区工业绿色发展绩效水平均有所改善,其中广西以年均19.7%的水平居于领先。总体来看,各地区的工业绿色发展水平和改善幅度有较大差异,意味着各地区实现工业绿色发展的基础条件不同,有必要对不同地区采取分类管理方式,以有效促进各地区工业绿色发展。The study on the evaluation on green development has been a key research topic in green economy study. This paper tries to extend the green development evaluation study into industry level, which provides support for monitoring the progress of industry green development in China. First of all, this paper makes a definition for industry green development as followings： while promoting industrial growth and providing more products and services, the industry should try to green manufacturing process, provide green goods and services and create green industries to decouple resource use and pollution from industrial development. And thus, we believe that the progress in industry green development could be measured from the following three aspects： green production, green product and green industry. This is a theoretical basis for the evaluation of industry green development. Then, an Industry Green Development Performance Index （IGDPI） for the monitoring of green production is developed and applied to China. The result shows that China＇ s IGDPI is improved dramatically from 2005 to 2010 with an average speed of 9.5% annually, implying that industry production and resource consumption and pollution emission are decoupling. However, as the change rate of IGDPI is slowing down year by year, China needs to dig new energy saving and pollution reduction potential in future. While in crosswise comparison, we find that Tianjin, Beijing, Guangdong, et al. , are the ones that perform best, even though their advantages differ from each other. For example, Tianjin is leading in water use, Beijing is lagging in land use and Guangdong performs best in energy use. While for the one who does not perform good enough, Ningxia might be a bad example as its energy use and emission control are lagging greatly behind others. Meanwhile, the progress of IGDPI in 2005 -2010 does happen in every area, and Guangxi is the one that perform best. To sum up, the IGDPI and change rate of IGDPI differ greatly among various provinces, and th

关 键 词：工业绿色发展 综合指数 绩效 评估 

分 类 号：F420[经济管理—产业经济]