检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中华人民共和国国务院办公厅,北京100017 [2]河北省人民检察院,河北石家庄050051
出 处:《河北法学》2013年第8期196-200,共5页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:专利权保护对于鼓励发明创造、促进科技进步具有重大意义。对专利权实施刑法保护,有其法理依据和现实依据,也是国际通行做法。随着我国经济社会快速发展,专利法作出了多次修正,但相应的刑事立法依旧没有改变。近年来,涉及专利权的违法犯罪行为日益增加,在司法实践层面带来了诸多困难。为改变这种现状,必须加强专利权的刑法保护。为此,建议采取结合型立法模式,加强相关立法,将罪名设置清晰化,明确专利侵权犯罪,以财产惩罚为主要刑罚。The patent protection is great significance to the encouragement of innovation, promotion of scientific and technological progress. Implementation of the patent protection by criminal law has legal and practical basis with international practice. Along with the rapid economic and social development, a number of amendments has been made in patent law, but the corresponding legislation in criminal law still has not changed. In recent years, the increasing criminal acts involving patent has brought a lot of difficulties in the judicial practice. To change this situation, we must strengthen the function of the criminal law in protection of patents. For this reason, it is recommended to take conjugated legislative model, strengthen the relevant legislations, clarify the criminal charge, clearly define the patent infringement crime, and use property punishment as the main penalty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30