检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]吉林财经大学,吉林长春130117
出 处:《金融发展研究》2013年第7期68-73,共6页Journal Of Financial Development Research
基 金:吉林省教育厅"十二五"社科项目"吉林省现代服务业发展状况调查研究"
摘 要:本文运用贸易竞争力指数、显性比较优势指数、相对贸易竞争力指数、相对显性比较优势指数和政策偏离度等指标对中日两国保险服务贸易竞争力、竞争优势及贸易政策倾向进行实证分析,结果显示:2006—2011年中日两国保险服务贸易均一直处于缺乏竞争力和竞争优势的状态,但两国的竞争性发展趋势有所不同,相对竞争力与竞争优势在不断发生变化;2006—2011年中日两国保险服务贸易出口政策实施力度有所差别,目前,中国的保险服务贸易政策已经不再单纯地鼓励出口,政策调整较为合理。This paper employs trade competitiveness index, revealed comparative advantage index, comparative trade competitiveness index, comparative revealed comparative advantage index and degree of policy deviation to con- duct an empirical analysis on the competitiveness of China and Japan in insurance service trade, their comparative ad- vantages and trade policy inclinations. The results show that firstly, the insurance service trade of China and Japan was lacking in competitiveness and comparative advantages from 2006 to 2011. But they have different development trend in terms of competitiveness. Their comparative competitiveness and advantages were constantly changing. The imple- mentation force of export policy for insurance service of China and Japan are different. At present, China' s insurance service trade has no longer singly relied on export and the policy adjustment is rather reasonable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.154