检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长沙学院法学与公共管理系,湖南长沙410022 [2]中共福建省委党校,福建福州350001
出 处:《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第4期73-78,共6页Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
基 金:湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目"马克思主义中国时代化大众化与社会和谐"(2010YBB023)
摘 要:哈耶克一方面坚持主观价值立场,否认普世价值,另一方面坚信只有资本主义自由市场经济而非社会主义计划经济才具有价值合理性,因此就公正、平等、权利等方面对两者进行了评判,确立了其对自由市场经济个人自由的价值自信,但其价值自信愈坚定其价值立场便愈显普世性,从而形成价值悖论。哈耶克的困境说明,其价值自信是片面的,难免成为另一种"致命的自负"。Hayek held up a subjective value position and denied universal value on the one hand, but on the other hand firmly held that only the capitalist free market economy instead of socialist panned economy has the value rationality, and therefore evaluated justice, equality and rights between the free market economy and panned economy to establish his value self-confidence for the free market economy. However, the firmer his value self-confidence the more universal his value position, thus resulting in a value paradox. Hayek's dilemma shows that his value self-confidence is one-sided and will eventually become another kind of "fatal conceit".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.106.206