基于评价理论的语言学书评标题研究  

作　　者：布占廷[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学外国语学院,山东济南250100 [2]青岛大学师范学院,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《外语与外语教学》2013年第4期53-57,共5页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"英汉语言学书评语篇中的负向评价研究"(项目编号:11YJC740002);中国外语教育基金项目"基于语料库的评价语言研究"(项目编号:ZGWYJYJJ2012A34)阶段性成果

摘　　要：本文基于评价理论对国内的语言学书评类标题的特点进行考察。研究首先发现,书评指示语的措辞呈现多样性,但在此语境中都具有一定的评价意义。其次,部分书评标题中含有引子,其功能是为书评建立理据。根据所凸显意义的不同,引子可分为评价型和经验型。研究表明,以上两个特点表现出高度的机构变异性。语言学书评话语实践是一种有步骤、有目的的社会化过程。在此过程中,书评者语言选择和期刊语言选择相互作用,共同决定语言选择结果,并进而融入语言系统,影响后续的语言发生。This paper examines the characteristics of linguistic book review headlines published in China on the basis of the Appraisal Theory. The analysis reveals that firstly, the signaling words of book reviews may vary significantly in category, but they all have certain degree of evaluative meanings. Secondly, some headlines have lead-ins, which serve to establish a warrant for the book review concerned. These lead-ins can be classified into two types： evaluative and experiential. The analysis further shows that the above two characteristics exhibit great institution- al variations. The discourse practice of linguistics book reviews is a staged, purposeful social process. In this process, the linguis-tic choices of book reviewers and those of the journals interact with each other to determine the final shape of the texts, which are integrated into the linguistic system to influence the subse-quent linguistic genesis.

关 键 词：评价理论 语言学书评标题 书评指示语 引子 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]