检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈志东[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学附属第六人民医院,上海200233
出 处:《中国药房》2013年第30期2790-2796,共7页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:分析我国约定日剂量的设定方法。方法:通过收集中国知网和万方数据知识服务平台的相关资料,对2010年1月-2012年11月国内发表的文献中有关抗菌药物约定日剂量的设定方法进行列表比较。结果:我国抗菌药物约定日剂量设定方法多达49种,设定依据和设定值不尽相同。主要设定依据为《新编药物学》、药品说明书和《中华人民共和国药典临床用药须知》。设定值之间或与卫生部抗菌药物临床应用监测中心发布的约定日剂量相比,均存在不同程度的差异。结论:我国约定日剂量设定方法极不规范,应引起足够重视。OBJECTIVE:To analyze the methods of DDD assignment in China.METHODS:By collecting related data from CNKI and Wanfang database,the methods of antibacterial DDD assignment in Chinese papers published from Jan.2010 to Nov.2012 were compared.RESULTS:There were 49 methods of antibacterial DDD assignment,and the assignment references and antibacterial DDD values were not all the same.The main references were New Pharmacology,package inserts and Clinical Guidance of Chinese Pharmacopoeia.There were many differences between antibacterial DDD assignment values and the values from MOH center for antibacterial surveillance.CONCLUSIONS:The methods of antibacterial DDD assignment are extremely not standard in China,which should be taken seriously.
分 类 号:R195.1[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38