检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]深圳市福田区中医院,广东深圳518038 [2]北京大学深圳医院超声影像科,广东深圳518036
出 处:《医学综述》2013年第15期2868-2870,共3页Medical Recapitulate
摘 要:目的探讨运动再学习法改善脑梗死所致吞咽障碍的可行性。方法选取2007年1月至2012年1月深圳市福田区中医院收治的脑梗死所致吞咽障碍患者64例,采用简单随机法分为对照组和试验组,分别采用常规药物治疗和常规药物治疗加运动再学习法,于治疗后1、2、4、6个月时应用藤岛一郎吞咽疗效评价标准评价治疗效果。结果在试验开始后的1、2个月时,两组的藤岛一郎吞咽障碍评分和两组的总有效率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);4、6个月时,两组的藤岛一郎吞咽障碍评分和两组的总有效率比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在常规药物治疗的基础上,联合开展运动再学习法有利于脑梗死所致吞咽障碍的康复。Objective To explore the feasibility of motor relearning program in dysphagia rehabilitation after acute cerebral infarction.Methods Sixty-four cases of dysphagia after acute cerebral infarction of Futian District Chinese Medicine Hospital in Shenzhen from January 2007 to January 2012 were selected,and divided randomly into control group(group A) and experimental group(group B),group A used conventional pharmacological treatment,group B used conventional pharmacological treatment and the motor relearning program,and Toshima Ichiro swallowing efficiency scores was applied for evaluation of the treatment at 1,2,4,6 months of treatment respectively.Results After 1 and 2 months of the treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in both Toshima Ichiro swallowing efficiency scores and total effective rate between the two groups(P 0.05);while there was statistically significant difference in both Toshima Ichiro swallowing efficiency scores and total effective rate between the two groups(P 0.05) after 4 and 6 months of the treatment.Conclusion Motor relearning program based on conventional pharmaceutical treatment is good for dysphagia rehabilitation after acute cerebral infarction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.19.32