社会倾销与反社会倾销政策的贸易效应分析  

Trade Effects of Social Dumping and Antidumping Policies

作　　者：杨仕辉[1,2] 谢晓娟[2] 刘丹丹[2] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学资源环境与可持续发展研究所 [2]暨南大学经济学院

出　　处：《产经评论》2013年第4期103-114,共12页Industrial Economic Review

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目“环境倾销与环境管制的博弈分析、效应比较与策略选择”(项目编号:71273114,主持人杨仕辉)

摘　　要：本文基于战略环境-贸易理论建立南北两国博弈模型,分析了社会倾销的贸易效应,发现社会倾销对南方国家和全球福利有利,但于北方国家不利。北方国家为此可以选择劳工标准、社会条款和反社会倾销税三种政策。本文重点分析比较了这三种政策的贸易效应,结果表明:就抵消社会倾销给北方国家带来的负面贸易效应而言,社会条款与反社会倾销税的机制作用是正向的,劳工标准政策则与之相反。南方国家应主动优先选择提高劳工标准或提高劳动生产率,而不是实施社会倾销。北方国家如面对南方国家出口的社会倾销,应优先选择社会条款或反社会倾销税等政策以消除南方国家社会倾销引起的不公平竞争。Based on the Strategic environment -trade theory, this paper established a South -North game model and investigated the trade effects of social dumping, found that social dumping is beneficial to South and the global welfare, but harm for North. Therefore, North can choose labor standard policy, social clause policy and antidumping tariffs policy. This paper focuses on analyzing and comparing trade effects of three antidumping policies. It shows that the mechanism of social clause and antidumping tariffs is positive in terms of offsetting the North＇s negative trade effects which is brought by social dumping, in contrast, the mech- anism of labor standard is negative. Thus, improving labor standards and labor productivity should be the pri- ority for South, rather than practicing social dumping. And facing social dumping, North should choose social clause and antidumping tariffs policy to eliminate unfair competition caused by South.

关 键 词：社会倾销 贸易效应 劳工标准 社会条款 反社会倾销税 

分 类 号：F224.32[经济管理—国民经济] X01[环境科学与工程]