检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕剑杰[1,2] 方剑俊[1,2] 潘杰锋[1,2] 戎燕燕[1,2] 罗侠女[1,2]
机构地区:[1]温州医学院附属慈溪医院急诊科 [2]慈溪市人民医院,浙江慈溪315300
出 处:《全科医学临床与教育》2013年第4期388-390,共3页Clinical Education of General Practice
基 金:浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2011ZHB013)
摘 要:目的探讨经皮氧饱和度(SpO2)监测在院外心脏骤停患者心肺脑复苏中的意义。方法 394例院外心脏骤停患者分成两组,监测组221例患者入院后立即进行心肺脑复苏,同时予以SpO2监测并观察波形为指导持续胸外按压;未监测组173例患者入院后立即进行心肺脑复苏,但未予以SpO2监测;两组比较心、脑肺复苏成功率及心跳骤停持续时间、自主心跳恢复时间和脑缺血缺氧时间。结果监测组心肺复苏成功117例(52.94%)与未监测组心肺复苏成功72例(41.62%)比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.98,P<0.05),监测组脑复苏成功14例(6.33%)与未监测组脑复苏成功6例(3.47%)比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.66,P>0.05)。监测组的心跳骤停持续时间(43.93±23.33)min短于未监测组(52.92±26.28)min,自主心跳恢复时间(22.13±18.72)min亦短于未监测组(29.09±21.40)min,差异均有统计学意义(t分别=2.45、2.35,P均<0.05);而两组脑缺血缺氧时间比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.16,P>0.05)。结论在经皮SpO2监测指导下进行胸外按压有助于提高胸外按压的有效性,从而提高心肺复苏的成功率。Objective To explore the significance of SpO2 monitoring in cardio-pulmonary-cerebral resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods A total of 394 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were randomly assigned into two groups, 221 cases as the monitoring group who received continuous chest compression with SpO2 monitoring by both figure and shape as a guide and 173 cases as the non-monitoring group who received cardio-pulmonary-cerebral resuscitation. The success rate of cardio-pulmonary-cerebral resuscitation, cardiac arrest duration, spontaneous cardiac recovery time, cerebral ischemia and hypoxia time of two groups were compared. Results The success rate of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation of monitoring group(52.94%) was significantly higher than that of the non-monitoring group (41.62%)(χ^24.98,P〈0.05). The success rate of cerebral resuscitation survival between the two groups had no significant difference(χ^21.66,P〉0.05).The cardiac arrest duration of the monitoring group was(43.93±23.33)minutes while the non-monitoring group was (52.92±26.28)minutes, the spontaneous cardiac recovery time of the monitoring group was (22.13± 18.72) minutes while the non-monitoring group was(29.09±21.40)minutes, the differences between them were statistically significant (t=2.45,2.35,P〈0.05). There was no significant difference in cerebral ischemia and hypoxia time between two groups (t=1.16,P〉0.05). Conclusions SpO2 monitoring is helpful to improve the efficacy of chest compression, so as to improve the success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3