检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭梅[1,2,3] 许振成[2] 夏斌[1] 张美英[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院广州地球化学研究所,广东广州510640 [2]环境保护部华南环境科学研究所,广东广州510655 [3]中国科学院大学,北京100049
出 处:《生态与农村环境学报》2013年第4期541-544,共4页Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment
基 金:国家科技重大专项(2008ZX07633-03);国土资源公益性行业科研专项(200911014-6)
摘 要:在传统行政区行政理念的主导下,流域政府皆以追求本地利益最大化为基本目标,甚少关注甚至漠视流域公共利益,流域政府间利益冲突严重,因此,难以对跨省流域生态补偿达成一致意见。跨省流域生态补偿的实施有赖于政府行政管理理念向区域治理理念的转变和相应的机制创新,包括建立流域政府间的民主协商机制、多元主体联合供给机制和中央对流域政府的选择性激励机制。Guided by the concept of traditional regional administration, the governments in the watersheds all follow a basic goal of maximizing their own local benefits. Consequently, little attention is paid to common interests of the whole watersheds, which often results in serious conflicts between local governments in the same watershed. It is, therefore, difficult for them to reach a consensus on ecological compensation of the trans-provincial watersheds. The implementation of ecological compensation of a trans-provincial watershed depends on replacement of the concept of regional government administration with that of watershed management and innovation of some relevant mechanisms, including the mechanism of democratic consultation between governments in the watersheds, a multi-subject joint supplying system and selective incentives offered by the central government to local governments.
分 类 号:X3[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.206.125