检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孔悦[1,2] 黄榕[1,2] 夏哲远[1,2] 许丽贞[1,2] 黄春燕[1,2] 殷婷婷[1,2]
机构地区:[1]解放军第174医院 [2]厦门大学附属成功医院护理部,福建厦门361003
出 处:《解放军护理杂志》2013年第14期1-4,共4页Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
基 金:南京军区医学科技创新课题项目(12MA064)
摘 要:目的探索团体咨询对灾难救援护理人员急性应激反应的干预效果。方法 2013年6月,选取参与厦门市BRT公交车爆炸批量伤员救护的41名急性应激反应(acute stress response,ASR)阳性护士,按照随机数字表法分为观察组20名、对照组21名。对照组护士进行一般的心理健康教育,观察组护士进行5次团体咨询干预。两组护士干预前后均用斯坦福急性应激反应量表(Stanford acute stress reaction questionnaire,SASRQ)进行测评。结果与对照组比较,观察组护士SASRQ总评分、分离症状、焦虑或醒觉性、烦恼程度、体验最糟糕症状天数的评分均明显降低,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),但创伤再体验、回避等方面的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论团体咨询可有效地降低灾难救援护理人员的ASR程度。Objective To explore the effects of group counseling on acute stress response for nurses after the disas- ter. Methods Totally 41 nurses with the Acute Stress Response (ASR) were randomly divided into control group (21 cases) and observational group (20 cases) according to operation table of random number. Nurses in the con- trol group were given general psychological health education, while nurses in the observational group were given five times group counseling. Both groups were assessed by Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire(SASRQ) before and after interventions. Results The observational group, as compared with control group, the scores of SASRQ,dissociation symptom, anxious or awareness, annoyance degree, the worst days experience symptoms were significantly lower after intervention (P〈0.05), however, no significant difference was found in experience after trauma and avoidance (P〉0.05). Conclusion Group counseling can relieve the acute stress response of the nurse after the disaster.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222