检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭景萍[1]
机构地区:[1]广东财经大学社会学系
出 处:《社会科学》2013年第8期70-79,共10页Journal of Social Sciences
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"法律情感逻辑及其实证分析"(项目批准号:12YJA840008)的阶段性成果
摘 要:法律的罪与罚交织着情感斡旋。耻感与罪感形成法律阻止犯罪的防御性情感机制。非正义情感唤起犯罪动机,负性情感压力成为惩罚犯罪的内在力量。诉讼包含因痛苦而复仇的强烈情感因素,法律是弥补被伤害人痛苦的重要社会制度。法官情感具有中立性,冰火两重严宽相济。旁观者对犯罪表现出与受害者"怨恨"截然不同的"义愤",民众法律情感斡旋直接影响司法的过程和结果。法律情感斡旋呈现多种质态,理论也必须如实描述。The crime and punishment of law are mediated by the emotion. Shame and guih which form the defensive emotional mechanism of law prevent the crime. The injustice emotion arouses crime motive. The negative emotional stresses become inner strength that punishes crimes. Lawsuits include revenge for pain. And law is an important system making up for the victims. The emotions of judge have neutrality. "Indignation" of the bystanders is quite different from "hatred" of the victims to the crimes. And in a sense emotional mediation from people can directly influence the judicial process and result. The theory should truly reflect a variety form of emotional mediation in law field.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.219