火器伤损伤程度的法医学鉴定(附63例报告)  

Forensic expertise on the degree of injury association with firearm (63 cases report)

作　　者：刘军[1] 郭秀改[1] 曹侠[1] 仇海华[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京市公安局朝阳分局,100044

出　　处：《法律与医学杂志》2000年第3期105-108,共4页Journal of Law & Medicine

摘　　要：目的　探讨火器损伤的致伤特点及活体损伤程度鉴定的有关问题。方法　 6 3例火器损伤主要按火器枪弹种类及数量分为四组 ,Ⅰ组 :霰弹损伤 ;Ⅱ组 :气枪损伤 ;Ⅲ组 :军用枪损伤 ;Ⅳ组 :射钉枪与爆炸损伤 ,对其进行前瞻与回顾性分析总结。结果　Ⅰ组损伤多见于斗殴 ,损伤部位以四肢部多见 ,异物存留、损伤程度明显高于其它各组 ;Ⅱ组损伤多见意外 ,不易造成异物存留 ;损伤程度轻于其它各组 ;Ⅲ组损伤多见抢劫与杀人 ,损伤部位多见头部 ;Ⅳ组损伤较少见仅占 7 92 %,不是本文讨论的重点。四组损伤合并脏器、神经血管损伤及骨折 33例 ,占 5 2 38%,构成重伤、轻伤 5 0例 ,占 79 37%。结论　火器损伤程度较重 ,致伤机理有其自身特点 ,现行损伤程度鉴定标准对其体现不够 ,值得法医同仁加以重视。Objective\ To analyze the characteristics injures and degree of injury (DI) association with firearm \ Methods\ 63 cases of injured persons association with firearm were divided into four groups Group Ⅰ: injuries caused by shotgun, Group Ⅱ: injuries caused by airgun Group Ⅲ: injures caused by gun Group Ⅳ: injuries caused by other firearm Results\ In group Ⅰ, injuries was largely located in limbs with foreign body, caused by assault with weapon The DI was the highest in all groups Injuries in Group Ⅱ were mainly found in accidence without or litter foreign body The DI was the lightest in all groups In group Ⅲ, the injuries were mostly observed in head, caused by robbing and murdering There were litter cases in group Ⅳ (7 92% in total) The firearm injuries with damage of organs, nervous-vascular and fractures in all groups were common seen with 33 cases (5238% in total) Conclusion\ The DI association with firearm injuries were dependent upon type of firearm, it was full unexpressed about firearm injuries in assessment of standard used in present practice

关 键 词：火器伤 损伤程度 法医学鉴定 

分 类 号：R826.5[医药卫生—临床医学] D919.4[医药卫生—法医学]