检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶红军[1]
出 处:《国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报)》2013年第4期27-40,共14页INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
基 金:福建省社会科学规划重点项目"我国服务业国际贸易壁垒水平测评研究"(项目编号:2012A021)的资助
摘 要:本文采用Kohli(1991)的GDP最优模型,估算了世界农产品进口前20位国家318种农产品的进口价格弹性、农产品贸易限制性指数以及农产品进口关税导致的净福利损失。研究发现,一国农产品进口价格弹性与GDP大小正相关,与其发达程度则没有显著性相关关系。在多哈回合农产品贸易谈判中,我国可以在自身农产品市场不断开放的基础上,提高对印度、印度尼西亚、韩国、墨西哥和泰国等主要出口市场的要价。Applying Kohli' s (1991) GDP maximization model, this paper es- timates the import price elasticity of 318 HS 6-digit agricultural products import- ed by 20 leading agricultural importers in the world. Also calculated in this pa- per are Agricultural Trade Restrictiveness Index and Dead Weight Loss resulted from agricultural import tariff for each country. This research suggests that agri- cultural import elasticity of a country is positively correlated with its GDP, while the correlation of this elasticity with GDP per capita is not significant. In the Do- ha Round, this paper suggests, China is supposed to further open its domestic market and may raise its offer to its major exporting markets such as India, Indo- nesia, South Korea, Mexico and Thailand.
关 键 词:农产品贸易 进口价格弹性 贸易限制性指数(TRI) 福利损失
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104