检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈学东[1] 王中华[1] 田磊[1] 杨晓冬[1] 王世华[1]
机构地区:[1]海军总医院普外科,北京100048
出 处:《转化医学杂志》2013年第4期216-218,共3页Translational Medicine Journal
摘 要:目的探讨颈动脉内膜剥脱术(carotid endarterectomy,CEA)的适应证及围手术期处理。方法回顾性总结2001年2月—2011年2月在我科治疗的98例因颈动脉硬化狭窄(狭窄>50%)而行CEA治疗的患者资料;其中,有症状77例(78.6%),无症状21例(21.4%)。结果术后除2例(2.0%)死亡、3例(3.0%)发生一过性偏瘫和7例(7.1%)出现脑高灌注综合征外,其他患者疗效良好,未出现短暂脑缺血(transient ischemic attack,TIA)表现。术后随访1~10年,平均5.6年;随访76例,13例(17.1%)再狭窄>70%,9例(11.8%)再发TIA症状,4例(5.3%)出现脑梗死。结论对于临床检查发现一侧或双侧颈动脉狭窄>50%,特别是有TIA发作史的患者,可以考虑行CEA;双侧颈动脉狭窄者应分期手术治疗;做好围手术期处理,有助于减少手术并发症发生。ObjectiveTo study the indications of carotid endarterectomy(CEA) and perioperative managements. MethodsThe clinical data of 98 patients with carotid stenosis(stenosis〉50%) who underwent CEA were reviewed in our department from Feb. 2001 to Feb. 2011 retrospectively. Among them, there were 77 patients(786%) with transient ischemic attack (TIA) and 21(214%)with asymptom. ResultsIn addition to the death of two patients (2%), 3 cases (30%) with transient hemiplegia and 7 cases (71%) with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome during postoperation, other patients all got a curative effect and didnt appear TIA symptoms later. Seventy six patients were followed up for 1—10 years, the average time was 56 years, 13 cases (171%) with restenosis more than 70%, 9 patients (118%) with recurrent TIA symptoms, and 4 cases (53%) with cerebral infarction. ConclusionClinical examination found that unilateral or bilateral carotid stenosis for more than 50%, especially in patients with a history of TIA episodes, can be considered for CEA treatmentStaging surgery should be adopted in treating bilateral carotid stenosis,and paying attention to perioperative management can help reduce surgical complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15