碳捕捉与海底封存的诉讼管辖权冲突研究  

Positive Conflict of Jurisdiction Relating to Carbon Capture and Sequestration and Storage under the Subsea Bed of Geological Structure

作　　者：王淑敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《法学杂志》2013年第8期89-97,共9页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目"碳排放对于海洋生态的损害及其法律责任研究"(项目号:LI-IBFX0032011);2013年度辽宁经济社会发展课题"辽宁省海运温室气体减排及海洋生态法律保护研究"(项目号:2013lslktzifx-02);"辽宁省高校创新团队支持计划资助"项目(项目号:WT2012002);"中央高校基本科研业务费"资助项目(项目号:3132013322)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：国际社会缺乏普遍认可与遵行的碳捕捉与海底封存诉讼管辖权的规则,以及各国准据法和民事诉讼法均存在差异,是导致捕获地、运输地、封存地等国的诉讼管辖权冲突的根本原因。为了避免各国过度扩大本国法院的管辖权,尽快加入海牙《协议选择法院公约》、完善碳捕捉与海底封存国际公约的争端解决机制、制定我国新《民事诉讼法》相关司法解释,是克服冲突、有效解决因碳捕捉与海底封存污染海洋环境而引起诉讼的三条捷径。This paper focuses on the fundamental reasons for the positive conflicts of jurisdic- tions regarding to the places of capture, transportation or storage due to short of international uni- form rules and different lex causae or domestic civil procedural law. In order to prevent excessive jurisdiction, it is introduced three best methods for overcoming the conflict trouble and effective settlement for the disputes of environmental pollution of carbon capture and sequestration and storage under the subsea bed of geological structure arose. Firstly there is a preliminary discus- sion about the importance of joining in the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements as soon as possible. Secondly it is intended to be a remedy for the international settlement as well as puts forward some suggestions benefit for the Opinions of the Supreme Court on Implementing the Civil Procedural Law lastly.

关 键 词：碳捕捉 海底封存 诉讼管辖权冲突 

分 类 号：D997.3[政治法律—国际法学]