倡议联盟框架视角下我国运动员退役安置政策决策机制研究  

Research on the Decision-making Mechanism of Resettlement Policy for Retired Athletes in China in Perspective of the Advocacy Coalition Framework

作　　者：冯晓露[1] 熊晓正[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京体育大学,北京100084

出　　处：《体育科学》2013年第8期3-13,共11页China Sport Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目(08BTY023)

摘　　要：为探索我国运动员退役安置政策的决策机制,以经典的政策过程理论倡议联盟框架为理论基础,运用文献资料研究、文本分析等方法分析了我国建国以来的运动员退役安置政策,通过数10年来的政策变迁反馈来推导政策决策机制。研究发现,我国运动员退役安置政策变迁中存在"效率"与"公平"两大倡议联盟,二者在政策的深层核心信念、核心信念、次要方面等层面存在不同程度的一致性与分歧,这种一致性和分歧会因以政策为导向的学习而改变。不同倡议联盟在我国运动员退役安置政策中的主要争议以及以政策为导向的学习主要发生于政策核心信念层面,决定着政策的变迁和决策。To explore the decision-making mechanism of resettlement policy for retired athletes in China,this paper based on the theory the Advocacy Coalition Framework（ACF）,using literature,textual analysis and other methods analyzed the resettlement policy for retired athletes since the founding of our country,to deduce the policy decision-making mechanism through the feedback of decades of policy change.Study found that there exists ＂efficiency＂ and ＂fairness＂ two advocacy coalitions in the change of resettlement policy for retired athletes in China.They have different degrees of consistency and differences on the deep core beliefs,core beliefs and secondary aspect of the policy,and the consistency and differences will change as the policy-oriented learning occurred.The controversy and policy-oriented learning of the policy in different advocacy coalition is mainly presented at the level of core beliefs of the policy,and it determines the policy change and decision-making.

关 键 词：倡议联盟框架 运动员安置 政策变迁 决策机制 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]