平衡针治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效的随机对照观察  

Randomized Controlled Trail on Balance Acupuncture in Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

作　　者：陈秋菊[1] 王文远[1] 李瑞[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学,北京100029

出　　处：《辽宁中医杂志》2013年第8期1690-1692,共3页Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目资助(2007CB512704)

摘　　要：目的:对比观察平衡针和传统针疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:采用多中心随机对照研究,研究纳入受试者287例,治疗组143例和对照组144例。治疗组采用平衡针治疗,单取"腰痛"穴。对照组采用传统毫针治疗,取阿是穴、委中、夹脊、腰痛穴、肾俞、大肠俞、腰阳关、阳陵泉、环跳、昆仑等穴,以临床症状分级为指标进行观察评价。结果:平衡针组和传统针组在临床疗效方面具有明显的差异性(P<0.05),平衡针组的临床治愈例数明显多于传统针组。结论:在临床疗效方面,平衡针组疗效明显优于传统针组,尤其是临床治愈明显高于传统针组。Objective ： To observe the clinical efficacy of balance acupuncture and traditional acupuncture in treatment of lum- bar disc herniation comparatively. Methods ： This study was a multi - center randomized controlled trial with 2 parallel arms. There were 287 participants in the study,of which 143 in the treatment group and 144 in the control group. The treatment group received balance acupuncture with Yaotong point ahme, while the control group received traditional acupuncture. Pain score by doctors and MPQ were employed in this study for observation and analysis. Scales of clinical symptom were employed in the observation and assessment. Results：Both groups had significance differences（P 〈 0.05）. And in particular, the cure rate of balance acupuncture was higher. Conclusion：Balance acupuncture has obvious advantage in clinical efficacy and in particular,lhe cure rate of balance acupuncture is higher.

关 键 词：腰椎间盘突出症 平衡针 针刺 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R245.31[医药卫生—针灸推拿学] R681.53[医药卫生—中医临床基础]