检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学经济管理学院,江苏南京210094 [2]安徽工业大学经济学院,安徽马鞍山243002
出 处:《系统工程与电子技术》2013年第8期1702-1710,共9页Systems Engineering and Electronics
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71271114);教育部人文社会科学规划基金(10YJA630020)资助课题
摘 要:在实际决策问题中,决策属性间往往存在一定的交互作用,而传统决策方法并不能有效处理。针对这种情况提出了一种基于马田系统(Mahalanobis-Taguchi system,MTS)和φs转换的模糊积分多属性决策方法。该方法针对φs转换法利用属性权重确定λ模糊测度存在的问题,提出利用Shapley值代替属性权重来确定λ模糊测度,同时提出了一种基于马田系统的Shapley值测度方法,并给出了合理性分析。最后通过实例分析了不同交互度对决策结果的敏感性,并验证了利用Shapley值确定的λ模糊测度更有利于决策。For actual decision making problems, the traditional decision making methods can not effectively deal with the interaction between attributes. To solve this problem, a fuzzy integral multiattribute decision making method based on Mahalanobis-Taguchi system (MTS) and φs transformation is proposed. In this method,to overcome the problem of the λ fuzzy measure identification method based on φs transformation and the weights of attributes, this paper uses the Shapley value instead of weight to determine λ fuzzy measure. At the same time, this paper uses the Shapley value identification method based on Mahalanobis-Taguchi system, and the rationality of the identification method is analyzed. An illustrative example is given to analyze the sensitivity of the decision results based on different interaction degrees and verify the inference that the Shapley value is better than weight for decision making.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13