介入再通术与宫、腹腔镜联合治疗输卵管近端阻塞比较  

Comparison of interventional recanalization and hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy in the treatment of proximal tubal obstruction

作　　者：吴雪峰[1] 苏煜[1] 凌政[1] 赖昌生[1] 陈晓[1] 吴映波[1] 徐旭军[1] 谢树英[1] 

机构地区：[1]玉林市红十字会医院,广西玉林537000

出　　处：《华夏医学》2013年第4期697-699,共3页Acta Medicinae Sinica

基　　金：玉林市科技攻关计划项目资助(玉林市科攻11069008)

摘　　要：目的:比较介入再通术与宫、腹腔镜联合治疗输卵管近端阻塞的疗效,寻找输卵管近端阻塞病变的较佳治疗措施。方法:将96例输卵管近端阻塞患者随机分为介入组和对照组,分别进行介入再通术与宫、腹腔镜联合治疗,分析临床疗效。结果:两组患者再通率和宫内妊娠率相比介入组患者输卵管总通畅率明显高于对照组,两组对比P<0.05,具有统计学意义。介入组宫内妊娠率明显高于对照组,两组对比P<0.05,具有统计学意义。结论:介入再通术可有效疏通输卵管近端阻塞,提高宫内妊娠率。Objective. To compare the interventional recanalization and palace, laparoscopic treatment of proximal tubal obstruction, looking for proximal tubal occlusion of better treatment measures. Methods. 96 cases of proximal tubal obstruction group and control group, and respectively treated roscopic treatment, then did clinical analysis. pat by ients were randomly divided into intervention interventional recanalization and palace, lapa-Results： The intervention group of patients with tub-al total patency rate was significantly higher than the control group（P〈0. 05）. The intrauterine pregnancy rate in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Interventional recanalization can effectively clear the proximal tubal obstruction, im-prove the rate of intrauterine gestation.

关 键 词：输卵管 阻塞 介入 再通 腹腔镜 

分 类 号：R713.5[医药卫生—妇产科学]