检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付立庆[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院 [2]中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心
出 处:《中国法学》2013年第4期149-157,共9页China Legal Science
摘 要:面对不可避免的刑法规范供给不足现象,刑法适用解释大有可为。但是通过适用解释扩充刑法规范的供给,必须在罪刑法定原则之下厘清其与类推适用之间的界限,在此问题上,迄今为止的主流努力虽瞄准了正确的方向,但仍有进一步推进的空间。立足于刑罚积极主义的立场,根据社会一般人是否会对某种解释结论产生"明显突兀感"来区分类推适用和扩大解释,有助于刑法在调整社会矛盾中发挥更重要的作用。The interpretation of criminal application plays a significant role during times of lacking criminal provisions. However, it is necessary to clarify the demarcation line between the interpretation criminal application and the application by analogy under the principle of legality in order to supply criminal provisions by using inter- pretation should the supplement. With respect to this issue, there is still room for improvement although the aca- demic mainstream has aimed at a correct direction. From the perspective of the penalty activism, distinguishing appli- cation by analogy and extensive interpretation according to whether the common people can feel "obvious incongruity" on certain interpretation will help criminal law to play a more important role in adjusting social contradictions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185