检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丘春柳[1]
机构地区:[1]汕头大学医学院第一附属医院,广东汕头515041
出 处:《中国民康医学》2013年第15期20-22,共3页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
基 金:汕头市重点科技计划项目[2011]46号
摘 要:目的:比较万拉法新缓释片与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的临床疗效和不良反应。方法:将80例抑郁症患者随机分成万拉法新缓释片组(研究组40例,75~375 mg/d、po)与帕罗西汀组(对照组40例,10~20 mg/d、po)治疗,疗程6周,应用汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、临床疗效总评量表(CGI)及不良反应症状量表(TESS)进行评定。结果:万拉法新缓释片组抗抑郁作用起效快,在第1、2周末HAMD评分低于帕罗西汀组(P<0.05和P<0.02)。经过6周治疗,两组有效率相当(P>0.05),两组不良反应均较轻微(P>0.05)。结论:万拉法新缓释片起效较快,是一种安全有效的抗抑郁药。Objective: To compare clinical efficacy and side effects of venlafaxine sustained-release tablets and paroxetine in treatment of depression.Methods: 80 patients with depression were randomly divided into venlafaxine sustained-release tablets group(40 cases,75mg ~ 375mg/d po) and paroxetine group(40 cases,20 ~ 40 mg/d po),and each group was treated for 6 weeks.HAMD,CGI and TESS were adopted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and side effects before and 1,2,4 and 6 weeks after the treatment.Results: Venlafaxine sustained-release tablets showed more rapid effects than paroxetine and HAMD score of venlafaxine sustained-release tablets was lower than that of paroxetine group 1 and 2 weeks after the treatment(P &lt; 0.05 and P &lt; 0.02).6 weeks after the treatment,there were no significantly differences between the two groups in the total effective rates and side effects rates(both P &gt; 0.05).Conclusions: Venlafaxine sustained-release tablets are a safe and effective antidepressant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.42.128