不同静脉采血方法对血液标本溶血的影响研究  

Study on Different Venous Sampling Methods Influence on Blood Specimen Hemolysis

作　　者：杜伙芬 

机构地区：[1]蒲江县中医医院,四川蒲江611630

出　　处：《中外医学研究》2013年第23期89-90,共2页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH

摘　　要：目的:对比分析传统的一次性注射器静脉采血法与真空采血法对血标本溶血现象的影响差异,明确真空采血法的先进性、实用性及科学性。方法:将300例急诊抢救室里需要进行静脉采血的患者随机均分成试验组和对照组,试验组真空采血法留取血液标本,对照组用一次性注射器静脉采血法留取血液标本,比较两组血液标本发生的溶血情况。结果:试验组采用真空采血法留取血液标本发生的溶血率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:真空采血法留取的血液标本溶血率低于传统的一次性注射器静脉采血法留取的血液标本溶血率。Objective： Comparative analysis the traditional disposable syringe venous sampling method and vacuum blood collection method the influence of the differences of blood specimen hemolysis phenomenon, explicitly advanced vacuum blood sampling method and nursing methods.Method： 300 cases of emergency vein blood of patients in intensive care is needed in a random combination of the control group（n=lS0） were divided into experiment, the experimental group of vacuum blood collection method to return blood specimens, the control group with disposable syringe in pursuance of law to return blood specimens, compared two groups of blood specimen hemolysis occuiTed.Result： The experimental group USES the vacuum blood sampling method to return blood specimen hemolysis rate was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Vacuum blood sampling method to return blood specimen hemolysis rate is lower than the traditional disposable syringe venous sampling method to return blood specimen hemolysis rate.

关 键 词：真空采血法 静脉采血 溶血 护理 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]