多模式镇痛与硬膜外自控镇痛在肛肠病术后的应用比较  

Comparison on Analgesia Efficacy of Multiple Mode Analgesia with Patient-controlling Epidural Analgesia

作　　者：陈凌燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]青海省中医院,青海西宁810000

出　　处：《中国肛肠病杂志》2013年第7期52-53,共2页Chinese Journal of Coloproctology

摘　　要：为对比观察多模式镇痛与硬膜外自控镇痛对肛肠病术后的镇痛效果，将110例行肛肠病手术患者随机分为两组，多模式镇痛组和硬膜外自控镇痛组，每组55例，观察两组术后镇痛效果、满意度及不良反应等项指标，判断分析疗效。结果显示，两组镇痛效果比较差异无统计学意义（P〉O．05），但多模式镇痛组患者满意度高，不良反应少。结果表明，多模式镇痛更适合于肛肠病术后镇痛。This study was to compare the analgesia efficacy of multipe mode analgesia（MMA） with patient- controlling epidural one（PCEA）. The 110 patients to be subjected to operation for their anorectal diseases were randomly divided into two groups, 55 cases for each group,one of which received multi-mode analgesi- a, another received PCEA;then their postoperative analgesia efficacy, satisfactory degree of patients and in- cidence of adverse reaction, etc. were observed and analyzed. Results showed the analgesia effieacies of both groups had no statistical difference（ P 〉0.05）,but compared with PCEA,MMA had more higher satisfac- tory degree,more less adverse reaction. Hence,MMA is more suitable to be used in anorectal disease pa- tlents.

关 键 词：肛肠病疾 多模式镇痛 自控镇痛 

分 类 号：R614.42[医药卫生—麻醉学]