判决性实验问题的一种求解策略——基于宇称不守恒案例  

A Solving Strategy to Crucial Experiment Problem——The Parity Non-conservation as an Example

作　　者：舒国萱[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州医科大学卫生管理学院,广州510182

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2013年第4期6-12,共7页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：教育部人文社科(10YJC720034);广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(GD10CZX05)

摘　　要：自迪昂—蒯因论点对判决性实验提出质疑来,判决性实验问题一直是科学哲学争论的焦点。格伦鲍姆曾就判决性实验问题进行过求解,但被劳丹、魏德肯等人指出,存在着两处致命的硬伤,至今仍未得到有效的解决。文章以宇称不守恒为例,尝试性地提出一种可能的求解策略。Since Duhem - Quine Thesis questioned the possibility of crucial experiment, which is always the focal point of the philosophy of science. Grunbaum tried to solve the crucial experiment problem but was challenged by Wedeking, Laudan, and others that there are two fatal problems in his arguenent. Based on the parity non - conservation, this paper puts forward a possible solving strategy to the crucial experiment problem.

关 键 词：判决性实验问题 迪昂—蒯因论点 宇称不守恒 求解策略 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]