检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced Computing, Zhengzhou Information Science and Technology Institute [2]State Key Laboratory of Information Security, Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences [3]Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Network Security and Cryptology, School of Mathematics and Computer Science,Fujian Normal University [4]Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences
出 处:《Journal of Computer Science & Technology》2013年第4期743-748,共6页计算机科学技术学报(英文版)
基 金:partially supported by the National High Technology Research and Development 863 Program of China underGrant No.2011AA010803;the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos.61100225, 61202450;the funding of Science and Technology on Information Assurance Laboratory (KJ-13-02);the Key Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province of China under Grant No. 122102210126
摘 要:Recently, Wang et al. presented a new construction of attribute-based signature with policy-and-endorsement mechanism. The existential unforgeability of their scheme was claimed to be based on the strong Diffie-Hellman assumption in the random oracle model. Unfortunately, by carefully revisiting the design and security proof of Wang et alfs scheme, we show that their scheme cannot provide unforgeability, namely, a forger, whose attributes do not satisfy a given signing predicate, can also generate valid signatures. We also point out the flaws in Wang et al.'s proof.Recently, Wang et al. presented a new construction of attribute-based signature with policy-and-endorsement mechanism. The existential unforgeability of their scheme was claimed to be based on the strong Diffie-Hellman assumption in the random oracle model. Unfortunately, by carefully revisiting the design and security proof of Wang et alfs scheme, we show that their scheme cannot provide unforgeability, namely, a forger, whose attributes do not satisfy a given signing predicate, can also generate valid signatures. We also point out the flaws in Wang et al.'s proof.
关 键 词:attribute-based signature existential unforgeability policy-and-endorsement
分 类 号:TN918.1[电子电信—通信与信息系统]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33