检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高志刚[1]
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院,上海201701
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2013年第4期31-39,共9页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目(12CFX008)"司法实践合理性问题研究";教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC820027)"司法制度评价体系研究";上海市教委科研创新项目(13YS130)"反思与重述:法律责任视角下人大监督司法的模式构建与路径选择"
摘 要:回应型司法,是司法机关对社会诉求所作出的回答或响应。回应型司法具有主动性、灵活性、参与性、民主性。回应型司法追求实质合理和形式合理的融合、目的合理和结果合理的统一、主体合理和行为合法的统一。在制度建构方面,回应型司法的基本理念是体现适度回应的渐进改革,通过建立满足社会主体多样需求的程序体系,建立通畅、理性的沟通与回应渠道,促使中国司法走出目前的困境。Responsive judicature is the reaction to the social demands from the judiciary with its initiative, flexibility, participation and democracy, which pursues the combination of reasonable practice and formality, as well as the integration of reasonable objectives and results. As to the institutional establishment, the basic principles of responsive judicature are appropriate responses of the evolution, through establishing a procedural system of satisfying the diversity of social subjects and an open and reasonable tunnel of response system, and finally guide the judiciary in China getting out of the present predicament.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249