进退维谷中的行政强制催告制度——对《行政强制法》第35条的解读  

An Interpretation of the Prompt System in Administrative Compulsory in Dilemma

作　　者：黄学贤[1] 郑哲[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2013年第4期133-140,共8页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：江苏省高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地苏州大学公法研究中心重大招标项目(2010JDxM040)

摘　　要：《行政强制法》第35条规定的催告制度由于立法的不完善,形成了催告行为的作出时间应在行政决定履行期限届满之前或者之后两种不同的解读观点,这两种不同的解读都存在着理论与实践的问题。通过类型化分析催告行为的法律属性,探寻立法背景,进行体系性解释,只有将催告行为的作出时间解读为在行政决定履行期限届满之后,才能更好地完善行政强制执行程序。Owing to the deficiency of the Art. 35 of Administrative Compulsory Law of PRC which regulates the prompt system, there are two different views about whether the prompt behavior should be made before or after the deadline for per- formance, but both views have their theoretical and practical difficulties. Through typologically analyzing the legal attributes of prompt behavior, seeking the background of legislation and making a systematic explanation, we may figure out that only the prompt behavior acts before the deadline for performance, the procedure of administrative enforcement can be better im- proved.

关 键 词：行政强制 催告 履行期限 行政行为效力 

分 类 号：D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]