西部地区与东盟五国承接国际产业转移的比较  

The Comparison Between the Western Eegion of China and Five ASEAN Countries in International Industry Transferring from Perspective of Industry

作　　者：胡新[1] 王彩萍[1] 林茂青[1] 

机构地区：[1]西安电子科技大学经济管理学院,陕西西安710071

出　　处：《统计与信息论坛》2013年第7期62-68,共7页Journal of Statistics and Information

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目<新时期西部大开发中区域产业转移及产业升级问题研究>(10XJY003)

摘　　要：金融危机后中国西部地区FDI流入势头强劲,但依然面对诸多挑战。由于东盟国家资源禀赋、市场潜力、劳动力成本和工业发展阶段都与西部地区相似,东盟国家成为中国西部地区承接国际产业转移的竞争对手。将危机后两者FDI流入进行对比,并利用修正后的产业级差模型分析了各地在承接FDI的竞争地位。结果表明,仅从产业层面比较东盟五国与中国西部省份,后者更有优势。同时构建了多元线性回归模型,探讨了新形势下西部吸引FDI的影响因素。研究表明,经济发展水平、产业集聚、地区生活水平、市场开放程度等是影响西部地区FDI区位选择的最主要因素。The FDI inflow of the West China has show a rising tendency after financial crisis. However, there are still lots of challenges and uncertainties. The developing countries in AESAN has become strong competitors of the West China on attracting FDI recently since they have lots in common from resource endowment, market potential, labor cost and industry development phase perspectives. This article compares both the FDI inflows after financial crisis. It creates a modified industry differential model to analysis the competition status in undertaking the FDI. Moreover, this article has applied the multivariate liner regression model to analysis the elements that attracts FDI to the West China. The result indicates, from the industrial perspective, the West China has more advantages than the developing countries in AESAN. Among all the possible factors, the level of economic development, industry clusters, regional living standards and market openness are the fundamental ones that determine the location of FDI. In conclusion, the article comes up with some counter plans and recommendations accordingly to FDI inflows in western

关 键 词：对外直接投资 国际产业转移 产业级差 中国西部地区 东盟五国 

分 类 号：F224.0[经济管理—国民经济]