也谈舆论与司法  

A Talk of Public Opinion and Judiciary

作　　者：陈斯彬[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华侨大学法学院,福建泉州362021 [2]中国社会科学院研究生院,北京102488

出　　处：《泉州师范学院学报》2013年第3期114-119,共6页Journal of Quanzhou Normal University

摘　　要：当前网络条件使得舆论比单纯的媒体更加立体化,但如实证分析会发现,即使舆论被误导,其对司法仍然起着监督的良性作用,并无不当干涉。一般情况下,舆论之所以能够干涉司法,源于我国司法具有政治从属性,舆论挟其政治效应干涉司法。司法不独立是舆论干涉司法、司法控制舆论这种恶性循环的源头。因此在中国当代,迫切的任务是司法独立。司法独立使得司法的归于司法,舆论的归于舆论,从而发展既能监督司法又不干涉司法的舆论规则,并在保证言论自由的前提下对舆论进行适度规制。虽然客观条件发生很大的变化,在中国迫切的问题仍然没有变,司法独立和舆论自由是相互联系的。Current network conditions make the opinion more three-dimensional than the media, but according to empirical analysis public opinion which is misleaded still plays a benign role of supervision on judiciary, with no undue interference.In normal circumstances, our judicial politics can interfere with the judiciary from the property, and public opinion. In contemporary China, the urgent task is the independence of the judiciary.The independence of the judiciary makes judiciary attributed to judicial, opinion attributed to public opinion,so as to develop both supervising judiciary and non-interference in the judicial rules of public opinion,moderate regulation and guarantee freedom of expression under the premise of public opinion.Although the objective conditions change a lot,a pressing issue in China has, not yet changed, and the independence of the judiciary and freedom of opinion are interrelated.

关 键 词：司法独立 舆论 言论自由 司法的政治性 

分 类 号：D926.4[政治法律—法学]