机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院核医学科,100020 [2]首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院放射科,100020
出 处:《中华核医学与分子影像杂志》2013年第4期254-257,共4页Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
摘 要:目的探讨肺通气/灌注(V/Q)显像在慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)诊断中的临床价值。方法回顾性分析临床怀疑CTEPH的76例患者(男46例,女30例,年龄27—84岁)的肺V/Q断层显像结果,与CT肺动脉造影(CTPA)检查结果进行比较。分别计算核素显像与CTPA诊断CTEPH的灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,并应用SPSS11.5软件行疋。检验,对2种方法诊断效能进行比较。同时对CTEPH患者V/Q显像受累肺段的分布进行分析。结果临床最终确诊CTEPH47例(肺动脉造影或病史结合影像学检查结果确诊),非CTEPH29例。V/Q显像对CTEPH的诊断灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为97.9%(46/47)、86.2%(25/29)、93.4%(71/76)、92.0%(46/50)和96.2%(25/26),CTPA的检查对应结果分别为78.7%(37/47)、93.1%(27/29)、84.2%(64/76)、94.9%(37/39)和73.0%(27/37),V/Q显像的灵敏度(∥=5.818,P=0.012)和阴性预测值(X^2=5.693,P=0.017)均高于CTPA。V/Q显像可以对CTEPH和特发性PAH及遗传性PAH进行鉴别诊断:CTEPH患者灌注显像呈肺叶、肺段分布的稀疏缺损区,而通气显像基本正常,特发性及遗传性PAH灌注显像则表现为不呈肺段分布的多发、散在的“斑片状”稀疏缺损区或血流灌注基本正常。在47例CTEPH患者的940个肺段中,肺灌注断层显像共检出585个(62.2%)受累肺段,平均每例患者有12.4个肺段受累,右肺受累比例明显高于左肺[36.2%(340/940)与26.1%(245/940)X^2=40.85,P〈0.01]。结论V/Q显像在CTEPH的诊断和鉴别诊断中具有较高的临床应用价值。V/Q显像正常可排除CTEPH的诊断;而在临床高度怀疑CTEPH、CTPA与肺动脉造影检查均为阴性时,V/Q显像对CTEPH的诊断具有重要意义。Objective To evaluate the lung V/Q imaging in the diagnosis of chronic thromboem- bolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Methods Seventy-six patients (46 males, 30 females, age 27- 84 y) with clinically suspected CTEPH who had undergone lung V/Q imaging, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) , pulmonary angiography (PA) and right heart cardiac catheterization were studied. The sensitivi- ty, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of lung V/Q imaging in de- tecting CTEPH were calculated and compared with those of CTPA. TheX2 test was used for statistical analy- sis with SPSS 11.5. The distribution of involvement of segments in 47 patients with CTEPH was analyzed. Results Forty-seven patients had a final diagnosis of CTEPH and 29 had non-CTEPH etiology. The sensi- tivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of lung V/Q imaging were 97.9% (46/47), 86.2% (25/29), 93.4% (71/76), 92.0% (46/50) and 96.2% (25/26), while those of CTPA were 78.7% (37/47), 93.1% (27/29), 84.2% (64/76), 94.9% (37/39) and 73.0% (27/37), respectively. The sensitivity (X^2 =5.818, P=0.012) and negative predictive value (X^2= 5.693,P= 0.017) for lung V/Q imaging were significantly higher than those of CTPA. V/Q imaging could identify patients with CTEPH from those with idiopathic PAH and familial PAH based on the almost normal ventila- tion imaging. The lung perfusion SPECT imaging detected 585 (62.2%) of involved segments among 940 segments in 47 patients with CTEPH, with an average of 12.4 involved segments in each patient. The num- ber of involved segments in the right lung was significantly higher than that in the left lung ( 36.2% ( 340/ 940) vs 26.1% (245/940) ; X^2 =40.85, P〈0.01). Conclusions Lung V/Q imaging plays an important role in diagnosis of CTEPH and in identification of CTEPH from other types of PAH. A normal V/Q imaging can effectively exclude CTEPH. In addition, V/Q imagi
分 类 号:R544.16[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...