慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床护理路径的效果观察  

STUDY THE EFFECT OF CLINICAL NURSING PATH ON CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE

作　　者：区利娟[1] 刘宇霞[1] 林凤瑜[1] 赖嫦娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山市人民医院,广东中山528403

出　　处：《现代医院》2013年第8期123-125,共3页Modern Hospitals

摘　　要：目的探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病(Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases,COPD)运用临床护理路径干预的效果。方法将慢性阻塞性肺疾病86例患者分为研究和对照两组,分别采用COPD临床护理路径和常规护理,比较其健康教育效果、平均住院天数和出院半年时肺功能状况。结果研究与对照组患者的健康宣教效果、平均住院天数及出院半年时FEV1%、FEV1/FVC%结果分别为:3.70分、10.70天、74.30%、66.50%和2.60分、14.30天、62.10%、59.40%。经统计学分析,所有研究因素均有显著性差异(p<0.01),具有统计学意义,即研究组患者健康宣教效果、平均住院天数和出院半年时FEV1%、FEV1/FVC%结果均优于对照组患者。结论用临床护理路径干预慢性阻塞性肺疾病可提高护理质量,对疾病康复有良好效果。Objective To study the effect of clinical nursing path intervention on chronic obstructive pulmo-nary diseases （COPD）. Methods The research included 86 patients who were divided into study and control groups, and studied the effect of health education, the length of hospital stay and pulmonary function after six months with clinical care path and routine care in study and control groups respectively. Results The effect of Health education, the length of hospital stay, and FEV,% ＆ FEVI/FVC% of pulmonary function after six months were 3.70, 10.70, 74. 30% % and 66. 50% respectively in the study group, but 2. 60,14. 30, 62. 10% and 59.40% respectively in the control group. It showed significant difference between these two groups （p 〈 0. 01 ）. Conclusion Clinical nursing path intervention in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease could improve the quality of care and have a good effect on the recovery from disease.

关 键 词：慢性阻塞性肺疾病 临床护理路径 健康教育 肺功能 

分 类 号：R563[医药卫生—呼吸系统]