检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李遐桢[1]
出 处:《政法论丛》2013年第4期96-105,共10页Journal of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社科基金项目<云计算技术条件下网络财产的发展趋势及保护规则研究>(项目编号:12BFX084)的中期研究成果
摘 要:代码能够在一定程度上保护虚拟财产,但虚拟财产更需要法律的保护。我们要综合运用虚拟性、排他性、永久性与交易性等来研判虚拟财产。最终用户许可协议中关于财产归属的约定是无效的,虚拟财产应该属于用户而非运营商。通过扩大解释或修正现有法律是调整虚拟财产的理想之选。虚拟财产具有多样性,其法律制度的构建要以物权法为核心;同时,知识产权法、侵权责任法等相关法律也要做相应修正以满足调整虚拟财产的需求。Code can protect virtual property in a certain extent, but more need legal protection. We should comprehensively apply virtual, exclusivity, permanent and transactional to judge virtual property. The agreement about property is invalid in the end user license agreements, the virtual property should belong to the user instead of operators. It is ideal by expanding interpretation or amended the existing law to adjust the virtual property. Virtual property has the diversity, but the core of the construction of the legal system is the property law. At the same time, other relevant laws, such as intellectual property law or tort liability law, also should make corresponding revision in order to meet the needs of adjustment of virtual property.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44