彭州乌木事件的法解释学思考  

Thoughts on Pengzhou Dark Wood Event in Law Hermeneutics

作　　者：王永霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院博士后流动站,山东济南250100

出　　处：《政法论丛》2013年第4期114-121,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：彭州乌木事件引起了法学界的激烈讨论,针对乌木的法律属性和归属,形成了埋藏物、天然孳息、无主物等几种主要观点。根据我国现行法律,由于不具备埋藏物和天然孳息的核心要素,乌木不可能归属这两个范畴之内。我国法律并未确立无主物的先占规则,从解释论的角度观察,不论采取国家本位主义还是个人本位主义立场都存在难以破解的困境,因此只能转向立法论角度进行制度设计。从立法论角度观察,国家本位主义立场需要的制度环境建设远远难于个人本位主义,同时个人本位主义对当前中国具有特殊的现实意义,应是较优选择。除对实体性法律问题本身的思考外,这一事件中反映出的法学研究问题也值得反思和认真对待。Pengzhou dark wood event stirred up much debate in our legal research cirde. There are several leading opinions about dark wood＇ s legal nature and its attribution, which include buried property, natural fruit and unclaimed property theories. According to our current law, dark wood doesn＇ t belong to the category of buried property or natural fruit because of its lack of the core elenents. There is no legal regulation about unclaimed property and occupation in China, and it will be got trapped in difficult position either to take nation oriented standpoint or citizen oriented one. Consequently, we should design new legal rules by ourselves to solve these problems. The citizen oriented standpoint is proved to be much better than the nation oriented one. In addition, we ought to think of those defects in our legal research appeared from the debate deeply.

关 键 词：乌木事件 无主物 先占 法解释学 

分 类 号：DF521[政治法律—民商法学]