检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:严火其[1] 李义波[2] 尤晓霖[1] 张敏[1] 葛颖[1]
机构地区:[1]南京农业大学人文社会科学学院,江苏南京210095 [2]南京市社会科学院社会发展研究所,江苏南京210000
出 处:《畜牧与兽医》2013年第8期1-7,共7页Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine
基 金:公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费项目(201003011)
摘 要:1 525份有效问卷的调查表明,中国畜牧行业大多数从业人员对动物福利有基本的认知。如75.4%的从业人员听说过动物福利,76.5%的从业人员赞成就动物福利立法,强迫生产者为猪鸡提供良好的生长和生存条件等。从业人员普遍认同动物的生理福利和环境福利,但对行为福利等却认知不足。从业人员在赞同动物福利的同时,又不太愿意因推行动物福利而承担过大的成本,如59.8%的从业者只愿意承担因遵守动物福利而导致5%及以下的成本增加。It is shown that,from a survey including 1 525 effective questionaires,most of the employees working in farm animal rearing industries in China have fundamental awareness of animal welfare,for example,75.4% of the employees have heard of the concept of animal welfare;76.5% of the employees support legislation on animal welfare so as to force entreprises to provide satisfying growing and living conditions for pig,laying hen and broiler.While generally thinking that,to animals,there exist both physiological welfare and environmental welfare,the employees seem to have ignored the behavioral welfare of animals.Though supporting the animal welfare,the employees are,to some degree,reluctant to support the animal welfare in terms of excess cost,for example,59.8% of the employees are willing to afford only no more than 5% increased cost resulted from more strict animal welfare standards.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3