检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省无锡市人民医院肾内科,江苏无锡214023
出 处:《实用临床医药杂志》2013年第10期14-16,共3页Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
摘 要:目的回顾分析糖尿病神经源性膀胱患者应用间歇性清洁导尿治疗的状况并评价护理干预对其疗效的影响。方法将93例应用间歇性清洁导尿法治疗糖尿病神经源性膀胱患者随机分为护理干预组46例和对照组47例,随访8周,分析总结护理干预对疗效和患者依从性的影响。结果 2组疗效均显著,但护理干预组较对照组膀胱残余尿减少显著,疗效更明显。结论护理干预在间歇性清洁导尿治疗糖尿病神经源性膀胱中有重要作用。Objective To analyze the efficacy of intermittent clean catheterization in the treatment of patients with diabetic neurogenic bladder retrospectively and to evaluate the influence of nursing intervention on the efficacy.Methods 93 diabetic neurogenic bladder patients treated with intermittent clean catheterization were randomly divided into nursing intervention group(n=46) and control group(n=47).After a follow-up of 8 weeks,influence of nursing intervention on the therapeutic efficacy and the compliance of patients was analyzed and summarized.Results All the patients had significant therapeutic efficacy.Residual urine volume in urinary bladder in the nursing intervention group was significantly less than that in the control group,so therapeutic efficacy in the nursing intervention group was much better.Conclusion Nursing intervention plays an important role in the treatment of diabetic neurogenic bladder patients with intermittent clean catheterization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229