检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹江林[1] 吴世凯[1] 肖荣诗[1] 张心怡[1] 牛建强[1]
机构地区:[1]北京工业大学激光工程研究院,北京100124
出 处:《中国激光》2013年第8期53-57,共5页Chinese Journal of Lasers
基 金:国家自然科学基金(51175008)
摘 要:采用IPG YLS-6000光纤激光器和Slab DC035CO2激光器,在近似相同的工艺条件下进行平板扫描焊接,通过Olympus光学显微镜测量焊缝横截面积,并计算熔化效率。结果表明:两种激光器焊接的熔化效率均随焊接速度先增加后减小,但是光纤激光焊接熔化效率峰值所对应的焊接速度要远远高于CO2激光焊接。进一步分析表明两种激光焊接熔化效率的差异与激光能量耦合的固有规律不同有关。因此,从焊接效率上考虑,光纤激光器更适合于高速焊接,而CO2激光器更适合于低速焊接。Bead-on-plate welding is carried out with an IPG YLS-6000 fiber laser and a slab DC035 CO2 laser under the similar conditions. The melting efficiencies are calculated based on the measured weld cross-sectional areas with an Olympus microscope. The results show that the melting efficiency increases firstly and then decreases with welding speed increasing in both cases. However, the welding speed corresponding to the maximum melting efficiency is far greater in fiber laser welding than that in CO2 laser welding. Further analysis demonstrates that the difference of the melting efficiency is relevant to the inherent difference of the energy coupling. Therefore, from the viewpoint of welding efficiency, fiber laser is more suitable for high-speed welding, while CO2 laser is more suitable for low-speed welding.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.244.172