检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学经济与管理学院
出 处:《财经研究》2013年第9期95-108,共14页Journal of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(12BJL057)
摘 要:文章采用DEA两阶段方法对中国各省市城市维护服务效率进行了分析。第一阶段DEA研究结果显示,各省市城市维护服务效率水平不高,28个省市各年平均效率值呈现倒U形趋势。第二阶段回归结果表明,总体来看,财政赤字、人均所得税税收收入、城市规模和开放程度对城市维护服务效率有显著促进效应,而教育程度与效率水平呈现显著负相关关系,西部地区与东中部地区存在显著区域差异效应。从细分样本看,西部地区与东中部地区、大中小不同规模城市的维护服务效率的硬约束和外部性效应存在异质性。实证结果对改善各省市公共服务水平有启示意义。This paper employs two-stage DEA to analyze the efficiency of urban maintenance services in Chinese provinces and cities. The first-stage DEA shows that the efficiency of urban maintenance services in Chinese provinces and cities is at a low level, and the average efficiency scores in each year is featured by an inverted U-shape trend. And the second-stage regres- sion results indicate that as a whole, fiscal deficit, per capita income tax, ur- ban scale and openness have the significant promotion effects on the increase in the efficiency of urban maintenance services, and education level is nega- tively related to the efficiency of urban maintenance services. However, there are significant differences between the western region and the eastern and central regions. The empirical results based on the subdivided sample conclude that the hard constraint and external effects of the efficiency of ur- ban maintenance services are heterogeneous between the western region and the eastern and central regions and among large, medium-sized and small cit- ies. The empirical results provide enlightenment for the improvement of ur- ban public services.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.151