检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吉冰洋[1] 孙燕华[1] 刘刚[1] 孙鹏[1] 郭莎莎[1] 龙村[1] 王古岩[2] 郑哲[3]
机构地区:[1]北京市中国医学科学院北京协和医学院国家心血管病中心阜外心血管病医院心血管疾病国家重点实验室体外循环科,100037 [2]北京市中国医学科学院北京协和医学院国家心血管病中心阜外心血管病医院心血管疾病国家重点实验室麻醉科,100037 [3]北京市中国医学科学院北京协和医学院国家心血管病中心阜外心血管病医院心血管疾病国家重点实验室心外科,100037
出 处:《中国分子心脏病学杂志》2013年第4期606-613,共8页Molecular Cardiology of China
摘 要:目的尽管迷你体外循环(MECC)技术住欧洲的临床使用已经超过十年,与常规体外循环相比其在临床上的优势仍仔在一定争议,就此问题我们针对过往的相关文献进行了大规模的系统评价和荟萃分析。探讨其在临床中的应用价值和在未来体外循环中应用的前最。方法我们对PubMed,EMBASE和CochraneLibrary数据库进行了相关文献的检索。使用Stata12.0软件进行了合并效应量的计算,并通过敏感性分析和meta回归进行了异质性来源的分析。进行累计性分析,观察合并效应量随时间的变化;观察漏斗图,并对研究进行Begg’s和Egger’s检验,以评估文献是否仔在发表偏倚。结果通过数据库检索共纳入41项研究,共计3202名进行心脏手术的成年患者.MECC可以显著降低输血牢(RR,0.5;95%CI,0.30.84;P=0.009;12=68.6%),房颤率(RR,0.7I;95%CI,0.580.86;P=O.001;12=0%),和心梗率(RR,0.458;95%CI.0.260.806;P=0.007;12=0%)。此外,MECC组的出血量、新鲜冰冻血浆输注量、血小板计数、红细胞输注量、ICU时间和肌钙蛋白T均娃著低于常规体外循环组。Meta回归分析的结果显示,在术区左窒射血分数较低或有较高欧洲心脏手术风险评分的患者中,MECC的优势更为明显。结论MECC可以保护血液,减少血制品的输入,并能降低术后心血管并发症的发生。Mela回归分析的结果提示我们术前状况较差的患者,MECC降低输血率的优势更为明显。Objective The benefits of minimized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) compared with conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC) are still in debate. We performed a system review and meta-analysis to evaluate the evidence of protective effects owed to MECC. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for relevant studies. Stata 12.0 was used to analysis-pooled results, heterogeneity searching and cumulative analysis for changes during time. To evaluate publication bias, visual observation of funnel plot, Egger's test and Begg's test were performed. Results 41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MECC and CECC were retrieved from database searching, enrolling 3202 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. MECC significantly reduced transfusion rate (RR, 0.5; 95%CI, 0.3 to 0.84; P=0.009; 12=68.6%), atrial fibrillation )RR, 0.71; 95%CI, 0.58 to 0.86; P=0.001; 12=0%), and myocardial infarction (RR, 0.458; 95%CI, 0.26 to 0.806; P=0.007; 12=0%). In addition, bleeding volume, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion volume, platelet count, red blood cell transfusion volume, ICU time, and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) were also reduced in MECC group. After meta-regression analysis, we found the trend that for patients with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the benefit of MECC for transfusion rate was more outstanding. Conclusion MECC did conserve blood cells, and reduce transfusion of blood production. It also reduced cardiovascular complications postoperatively. The results from meta-regression analysis showed that for patients in a more critical state, those patients who used MECC showed lower transfusion rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166