检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《护理学杂志(综合版)》2000年第12期713-714,共2页Journal of Nursing Science
摘 要:为了探讨手指不同取血方法对快速血糖仪测量值的影响 ,按取血方法随机分为自然流出组 (A组 )、按摩组 (B组 ) ,挤血组 (C组 ) ,每组 2 0例。患者晚饭后空腹 12 h,于次日晨选择其左手无名指采取末梢血即在床边用快速血糖仪检测 ,同时抽取静脉血送实验室用己糖激酶法 (HK法 )作检测对照 ,采用配对资料 t检验进行统计学分析。结果 :A组快速血糖仪测量值与 HK法较为接近 (t=1.183,P>0 .0 5 ) ;B组快速血糖仪测量值与 HK法相差较大 (t=3.819,P<0 .0 1) ;C组快速血糖仪测量值与 HK法相差最大 (t=5 .2 0 5 ,P<0 .0 0 1)。提示不同取血方法会影响快速血糖仪测量值的准确性 ,在进行快速血糖仪测定时宜采用自然流出法取血。The effect of various blood sampling from finger on the measuring values of rapid blood sugar device was investigated. Natural outflow group (A), massage group (B) and blood squeezed group (C) ( n =20 in each group) were developed in terms of the blood samplings. The patients fasted for 12 h after supper. Next morning the peripheral blood was sampled from the left fourth finger and the sugar values were measured by using rapid sugar device. At the same time, vein blood was taken out to measure the sugar values by using HK methods as control group. The results showed that in the group A the measuring values of blood sugar by rapid sugar device and by HK methods was similar ( t=1.183, P >0.05). In the group B there was a significant difference in the measuring values of blood sugar between rapid sugar device and HK method ( t=3.819, P <0.01). In the group C, the difference in the measuring values of blood sugar between the rapig sugar device and HK methods was the most ( t=5.205, P <0.001). It was suggested that various blood sampling could influence the accuracy of the rapid sugar device. Natural outflow method was selected to perform rapid sugar determination.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249